My suggestion about going through support was to get whatever problem you are having resolved. You should not be getting a run-around. If you have an issue number, I'd be happy to nudge the appropriate folks.
znor...@ca.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Leif Rundberget Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 Tuesday 8:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Anyone using TCPAccess? Norman, I did open an issue in March of 2009. I received the run-around from CA for three months and that combined with the fact that many third party vendors stopped supporting CATCPaccess is what put the nail in the coffin to goto the IBM CS software. I have been running this software on the system since 1995 when Interlink owned the product. When Sterling Software took over the product some stability issues started with the software. You have cycle the task every week to keep it going. Those issues were never fixed. And then a new issue with STN3270 started about 2009. One nice feature is that it does not need USS constructs to run (i.e. UID, default group, etc.) just a simple facility entry in the users security profile can control who gets access. But it does have it's hooks in USS with the T010PFSA module. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
