Michael, Thank you. No, there is no plans to have DFHSM in this partition. The client is satisfied with CA-ALLOCATE/CA-DISK. Thanks.
--- On Sat, 5/22/10, Michael Wickman <[email protected]> wrote: From: Michael Wickman <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION To: [email protected] Received: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 4:42 AM You might want to consider the management class activity if there is a possibility the data/application could move to a lpar with DFHSM. If that's unlikely, then it's not necessary. Mike Wickman -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of esmie moo Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 11:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [IBM-MAIN] SMS QUESTION Good Morning Gentle Readers, I am in the processing of allocating a SC & SG for several new aliases in SMS. The user doesn't want this particular STORAGE GROUP to have migration. This sounds okay however since there is no DFHSM in this partition is it necessary to pay particular attention or modify the MANAGEMENT class CONSTRUCT & ACS routines? The archiving tool in this partitioin is CA-DISK. Thanks in advance ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
