On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:17:05 -0400, Tony Harminc <t...@harminc.net> wrote:
>On 8 June 2010 11:54, Clark Morris <cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: > >> And we knock Microsoft Windows. Somehow the reliability and design of >> PDSE seems to be lacking. For starters it isn't even a superset of >> PDS when it comes to function because it can't be used for >> SYS1.NUCLEUS, SYS1.LINKLIB or SYS1.LPALIB. > >I discovered much to my surprise today that TSO EDIT doesn't support PDSEs. > >IKJ52330I PDSE ORGANIZATION OF DATA SET JCL.CNTL(HEX) NOT ACCEPTABLE+ >READY >? >IKJ52330I ORGANIZATION MUST BE PARTITIONED OR SEQUENTIAL > >Well perhaps I'm the only person left on the planet who still >remembers how to use TSO EDIT, but still. I thought PDSEs *were* of >partitioned organization, and indeed LISTDS agrees with me. > >Tony H. It appears you did this just as a test or to prove a point, but regardless, if you or anyone does want full screen ISPF like edit from native TSO that fully supports PDSE and z/OS Unix, I would suggest picking up a copy of Greg Price's REVIEW. http://www.cbttape.org/ Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
