Where can I find the pros and cons of controlling the content of the MC? > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 10:58 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Linklst; 6 of 1/half dozen of the other? > > In > <009066fa266f9b428db827deaa3c0e2701a6e...@exchangevs-04.ad.wsu.edu>, > on 06/14/2010 > at 12:13 PM, "Gibney, Dave" <gib...@wsu.edu> said: > > > I prefer to have the ISV datasets in LINKLST statements in PROGxx > >cataloged in the master catalog and not use volume references. > > And others prefer to keep them out of the MC. > > >Am I just being anal (I really don't like volume references in parm > >members anywhere I can avoid them), or is the a legitimate concern > >that would support either position? > > There are legitimate reasons for keeping as much as possible out of > the MC. Have you considered using static system symbols for the > volsers? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
