Thanks for the help everyone! We are going to go ahead with this on a limited basis, and will try to see if there is a measurable difference running our CICS region as a started job versus an initiator-based job. * Don *
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net <shmuel%2bibm-m...@patriot.net>> wrote: > In <aanlktimhtsthltssgmm_1jzzknkuhmm2odxy8cw60...@mail.gmail.com>, on > 06/30/2010 > at 08:34 AM, Donald Johnson <dej....@gmail.com <http://gmail.com/>> > said: > > >2. We created a user file like any other proclib file to hold the > >jobs - > >does it need to be PDSE or is a standard PDS fine? > > PDS is fine; I don't know whether PDSE will work. > > >3. Can we move existing libraries to IEFJOBS to use this feature? > > Bad idea; leave your proca in a proclib and invoke then from IEFJOBS. > > >4. Isthere anything from a security or performance standpoint we > >should consider - any danger in application teams updating the > >library with CICS region changes, for example? > > Like any other data set used by a critical system component, the more > people who have write access, the more at risk you'll be. From a > security standpoint it should be as tightly controlled as, e.g., > PARMLIB. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html