I'm sorry but your auditor is an idiot and may in fact be violating the terms of your vendor's license agreements (at least partially). Most license agreements expressly prohibit reverse engineering licensed code and the copyright notification makes it pretty clear that you don't have any authority or influence over what the vendor distributes. If that isn't sufficient for your auditor then have him sue IBM.
>However, like today, I was questioned about IEECB92S. I finally found an APAR that describe what the module does. >I do not have the luxury of saying 'Because, IBM did it that way'. I >have to explain or we get another mark against us in the audit report. Might as well get a mark because it's cloudy outside. That's just goofy. >I thought it would be nice if I could explain and show the auditor that IBM really did this and this is the way it is >supposed to be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
