In <8924.40203...@web82202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, on 07/20/2010
at 08:08 AM, Lloyd Fuller <leful...@sbcglobal.net> said:
>Remember: there used to be several levels of assembler: D, E, and F
>as well as H. D and E in particular had lots of restrictions on
>what MACROs and COPYs could do because of lack of memory. I believe
>D would run in a 64K real machine and E required 96K machine.
The DOS/360 and TOS/360 Assembler (D) had a 16 KiB design level and,
while it exceeded that, I don't believe that it exceeded it by that
much. Similarly, the OS/360 Assembler (E) and (F) had 32KiB and 64KiB
design points; again, they didn't exceed those sizes by that much.
Perhaps you meant that Assembler (F) required a 96 KiB machine.
>I believe HLASM is based on the H level assembler with lots of
>changes.
Soem of which had been developed at SLAC.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
