On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 01:43 +0200, Tomasz Rola wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, zMan wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > AT: > > > http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2010/07/22/242070/mainframes-still-not-dead-says-ibm.htm > > > There is a sentence which (I believe) is stand alone and to me it is > > > curiously worded: > > > "We can run Windows on zEnterprise, but we have not decided whether we can > > > justify this financially." > > > I think this says what I have been saying for a long time IBM has gotten > > > Windows to work on the mainframe. > > > > > > > No, I think it means that they can run it on zBX but aren't sure they want > > the support load and/or to have to support it through the HMC interface. But > > I don't know, that's just my interpretation! > > Actually, I think if one could run bochs or qemu on mainframe, then one > could also run Windows on top of this. I am not sure about performance. > > Regards, > Tomasz Rola
And Mantissa is still taking, a bit, about z/VOS which run Windows under z/VM. I think it is an emulator / JIT type process. -- John McKown Maranatha! <>< ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
