[email protected] (Shmuel Metz  , Seymour J.) writes:
> Certainly for the ES/9000 and 43xx processors; I'm not sure about,
> e.g., the 370/145.

late 70s there was start of effort to move the large variety of internal
microprocessors to 801/risc (iliad chips) ... this included the
follow-ons to 4331/4344 (i.e. 4361/4381), the as/400 follow-on to the
s/38 ... and a lot of other internal microprocessors.

various issues cropped up with iliad chips ... and the effort was
abandoned ... 4361/4381 doing their own custom cisc chip, crash project
to do cisc chip for as/400 (decade later, as/400 did move to varient of
801/risc power/pc chip), etc. in the wake of abandoning that effort,
some number of 801/risc engineers leave and show up on risc efforts at
other vendors.

i contributed some to the whitepaper that killed the effort for 4381.
low/mid range were veritical microcode processors simulating 370
... somewhat akin to current day Hercules effort on intel processors.
The idea was to move to common 801/risc for microprocessors
... minimizing the duplication of effort around the corporation
developing new chips and associated (microcode) programming environment.

The whitepaper claims were that cisc technology had gotten to the stage
where much of 370 instructions could be implemented directly in circuits
(rather than emulated in microcode). That even with higher mip rate of
801/risc, there was still approx. 10:1 instruction emulation overhead
(needed 20mip microprocessor to get 2mip 370) ... while cisc chip might
only be 3-5 mips ... quite a bit of that could be 370 instructions
nearly native in the chip.

small piece from that whitepaper:

- The 4341MG1 is about twice the performance of a 3148.  Yet the
4341MG1's cycle time is only about 1.4 times faster than the 3148's.
The rest of the performance improvement comes from applying more
circuits to the design.

- The 4341MG2 is about 1.6 times faster than the 4341MG1.  Yet the
4341MG2's cycle time is 1.4 times faster than the 4341MG1's.  Once
again, performance can be attained through more circuitry, not just
faster circuitry.

- The 3031 is about 1.2 times faster than the 3158-3.  Yet the 3031's
cycle time is the same as the 3158-3's.

... snip ...

previous reference to benchmark with 4341MG1 slightly faster than 3031
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#42 IBM 3883 Manuals

the 3031 reference is slight obfuscation. the 158-3 was single
(horizontal microcode processor) engine shared between the 370 microcode
and the integrated channel microcode. the 3031 was 158-3 with two
processor engines ... one dedicated to running 370 microcode (w/o the
integrated channel microcode) and one dedicated to the "303x channel
director) running the integrated channel microcode (w/o the 370
microcode).

recent reference to 158 engine with integrated channel microcode was
used for 303x channel director for all 303x processors (i.e. 3031 was
158-3 repackaged to use channel director, 3032 was 168-3 repackaged to
use channel director, and 3033 started out as 168-3 wiring diagram using
20% faster chip with channel director)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#15 History of Hard-coded Offsets

when 4361/4381 did come out ... there was some expectation that it would
continue the explosion in mid-range sales that started with 4331/4341
(at the end of the 70s) ... however by then, the mid-range market was
starting to move to workstations and large PCs (servers). a couple
recent posts discussing the explosion in the mid-range market ... and
then mid-range moving to workstations and large PCs:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#25 Idiotic programming style edicts
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#32 Idiotic programming style edicts
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#36 A Bright Future for Big Iron?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#41 IBM 3883 Manuals
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010m.html#43 IBM 3883 Manuals

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to