Did you lose the source code or something ? This is the most common reason I've run in to for not doing a recompile under these circumstances. - Paul Hanrahan
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL Program exhausting below the line storage > >They [IDMS] may also have some old subroutine that is AMODE 24 which >will >generally force every >thing below the line. > If the notion of using a program object instead of a load module does not strike you as intolerably 'cutting-edge', the Binder's SPLIT option was provided to address just this class of problems. I could work up more sympathy for the plight of this AMODE(24) application if it were not aleready being compiled successfully in an Enterprise COBOL V3R2 environment. This being the case, failure to move working storage above the line in inexcusable, as in omitting to recompile the whole shebang as AMODE(31). John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
