Ted, We are in violent agreement here.
I don't think security policies should have any bearing on the TSO Region size. Just because it is something they can administer doesn't mean they should. But then, Elardus did have a smiley face on that sentence. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 9:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] can I dynamically increase tso size > > >Since I'm more of a RACF guy, you may have difficulty to come up with a good > excuse... ;-D > > Why are you so concerned about whether somebody should have a larger region > size, or not. > > It's a hold-over from before memory became virtual and the small real memories > of the 1970's & 1980's. > > With today's larger installed memory, one or two TSO users with larger region > sizes is not going to hurt. > > Just because RACF can control region sizes, it does not mean you should have > tough enforcement policies regarding it. > > Worst comes to worst, and you have a concern, check with your performance and > capacity people. > > > - > I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! > Kimota! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
