Ed, Thanks, I think my brain has too many bits and bytes left over from long ago. So they tend to muddle each other.
Lizette > > On 9/28/2010 9:06 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote: >> I am z/OS V1.11 >> >> Just wondering if there are any concerns left with setting SWA to SWA=ABOVE >> in the JES2 Init deck? >> >> I remember something long ago and far away that if a program went after a >> UCB it was a token with this setting and not the real UCB address. Which >> could lead to an S0C4. >> >> Of course my fuzzy brain cell may be mis-remembering. > >Definitely misremembering. UCBs are not in SWA, they are in SQA/ESQA. > >Programs that don't use SWAREQ or equivalent coding to access/manipulate SWA >control blocks will not work with SWA=ABOVE. I can't imagine any modern ISV >product that doesn't do this properly. (But, just because I can't imagine it >doesn't mean it can't happen.) User code is an entirely different story... > >-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
