> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] För Hal
> Merritt
> Skickat: den 20 oktober 2010 17:46
> Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Ämne: Assigning UID's
> 
> Cross posted to MVS and RACF.
> 
> We don't use OMVS and have no plans to do so except for the bare minimum
> required. I did not choose to use the 'backstop' and so code a OMVS
> segment on each user and group profile as appropriate.
> 
> Somehow I have accumulated a number of (non human) profiles with UID 0 and
> a number of duplicate UID and GID assignments (that is, the same GID
> assigned to related groups and the same UID assigned to related ID's). I
> got dinged n a recent audit and am working on my remediation strategy.
> 
> I am of the 'old school' where 'any standard is better than no standard'
> and would normally try to craft UID's and GID's in a pattern such as
> xxyyyyyyyy where xx is a major grouping and yyyyyyy is a unique number. A
> 'major grouping' could be employee, process, etc.
> 
> Does this august group think it is worthwhile to  go to the trouble of
> doing this, or should I just assign random numbers?
> 

With doing so You are putting attribute like values on an identity key. 
I normally see such a thing bad, as this can be obsolete in the future 
because changes. 
But it may be a practical standoff in this case - but be aware of 
administration 
overhead...

My 2 röda ören.  :)


 
Regards, 
Thomas Berg 
_________________________________________ 
Thomas Berg   Specialist   A M   SWEDBANK 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to