On 21 Oct 2010 06:58:53 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Ted MacNEIL <eamacn...@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> Barbara, you have to learn to stop beating around the bush and tell us what >> you really feel! >> (8-{]} >> >> BTW, I used to be a big fan of PDSE. >> Now, except for source code, I won't use them unless I have to. >> >> Rather than constantly compressing source libraries, I find they make sense >> there. > >I suspect this is part of the "unless I have to", so please take this >as a straight question based on lack of knowledge on my part: >What about load modules that call DLLs and the like? Don't those >*have* to be in PDSEs? Can load modules be housed in zFS? program objects? DLLs? Would it be better to functionally stabilize PDSE and have the zFS the strategic direction forward? Would there be a performance improvement. Given that PDSE is NOT available at NIP (and I am aware that neither is zFS), would it be it be better to have just one way going forward that is available at NIP?
Clark Morris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html