Hi Bruno You mentioned some thing about some problems you faced related to OA12848. Please provide me with more details about this problem, as example the symptom, when you reported it to IBM, and when you got the FIX. Because we may have the same problem, and I need you help. I appreciate your help.
Thanks Mohamed Juma 13 Nov 2005 02:57:41 -0600, Brian Westerman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I'm going to simplify this a bit to show you the > differences. > > > In the same line of speach :-) > I am going to give you the real life example ! > OA03194 was created in order to limit the number of > SRB's an exploiter may > have running in the connector's address space. > ( for your own sake do not apply it ) > I am the guy who got hit with my small data sharing > configuration ( 2 x > z/990 with only 2 engines each ) > This resulted in the OA12848 ( opened for/by us ) . > Now i always said since years that a mono engine > system was a calculated > computer suicide , and nobody will ever change my > mind after this nightmare. > ( although i had 2 CP's on each machine) > So my advise to you ... never have an lpar with one > engne only . > Bruno > Bruno(dot)sugliani(at)groupemornay(dot)asso(dot)fr > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access > instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: > GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at > http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
