Hi Bruno, We too are victims of OA03194 and now waiting OA12848 to be closed... Currently living the the SLIP provided in the APAR. Do you have information about any progress with OA12848? Thanks, Gil.
On 11/13/05, Bruno Sugliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:57:41 -0600, Brian Westerman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I'm going to simplify this a bit to show you the differences. > > > In the same line of speach :-) > I am going to give you the real life example ! > OA03194 was created in order to limit the number of SRB's an exploiter may > have running in the connector's address space. > ( for your own sake do not apply it ) > I am the guy who got hit with my small data sharing configuration ( 2 x > z/990 with only 2 engines each ) > This resulted in the OA12848 ( opened for/by us ) . > Now i always said since years that a mono engine system was a calculated > computer suicide , and nobody will ever change my mind after this > nightmare. > ( although i had 2 CP's on each machine) > So my advise to you ... never have an lpar with one engne only . > Bruno > Bruno(dot)sugliani(at)groupemornay(dot)asso(dot)fr > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
