> The OP apparently didn't bother trying to look it up. And this does tend to be the OP's modus operandi.
> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:16:43 -0600 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Sp of load > To: [email protected] > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:02:39 +0000, Ted MacNEIL wrote: > > >>> Would anyone know what subpool load loads into > > > > > >>Yes. > > > >That was uncalled for. > > PKB > > >We're here to help, not obsfuscate. > > You didn't offer any help. > > >I expected better of you. > >Not like certain cretins on this list! > > Nice reply, Ted. You, who so often complains of ad hominem attacks. > Often incorrectly, I might add. > > As Shmuel pointed out, it depends. The OP apparently didn't bother > trying to look it up. I'd have to crack open a diagnostic reference to > answer accurately and I'm not about to do that for someone who isn't > willing to research. > > -- > Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
