Following up on the earlier thread on "permanent" LOAD. It appears to me that the 8-character module name(s) passed to CSVDYLPA must be unique, is that correct? That is, unlike LOAD, it is not possible for two different jobs or STCs to have access to different versions of a given module, both of which have the same name. Am I missing anything?
I am thinking specifically of a test version running in parallel with a production version. Both want to load their subsidiary module 'FOO', but the test version has a newer FOO than the one production already has in storage. Would the ADD fail? Or would the new FOO cause the old FOO to be deleted, leaving users who referenced it by address pointing at orphaned storage? Or would the new FOO replace the old FOO logically, but leave the old FOO in memory such that users who referenced it by address would continue to use the old copy? Thanks, Charles ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
