On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:26:44 -0800 Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
:>Following up on the earlier thread on "permanent" LOAD. :>It appears to me that the 8-character module name(s) passed to CSVDYLPA must :>be unique, is that correct? False. Very clear in the manual under the REQUEST=ADD keyword. :> That is, unlike LOAD, it is not possible for two :>different jobs or STCs to have access to different versions of a given :>module, both of which have the same name. Am I missing anything? Yes, you are. :>I am thinking specifically of a test version running in parallel with a :>production version. Both want to load their subsidiary module 'FOO', but the :>test version has a newer FOO than the one production already has in storage. :>Would the ADD fail? Or would the new FOO cause the old FOO to be deleted, :>leaving users who referenced it by address pointing at orphaned storage? :>Or would the new FOO replace the old FOO logically, but leave the old FOO in :>memory such that users who referenced it by address would continue to use :>the old copy? We have a winner. -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
