>Is the a way to automatically copy the old ETR abstract field into the new >SR title field? > >It is annoying that the SR title field is blank for records created via the >ETR system.
Don't hold your breath. I have griped about this before (also on this forum), and it went unaddressed. IBM probably figures that everyone will jump onto the new tool, and the rest ist just during conversion. After all, this internet tool is free, right? (That's the excuse I have always gotten from IBM for not fixing things in servicelink.) If you open an ETR via SR, it will have the correct 'abstract' afterwards. I think this has something to do with using a different retain field to fill in abstract in SR. Regards, Barbara Nitz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
