On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Rob Schramm <rob.schr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jim, > > IBM is continuing to enhance the performance... the 1.11 indicates that the > short-lived AT-TLS may have been worse prior to 1.11. I suspect that > the pseudo-conversational is falling into the short-lived camp... and > conversational is keeping the "conversation going" so to speak. > > You might ask for clarification on the CICS-L about psuedo v.s. > conversational. I am guessing that you are prior to 1.11 of z/OS. > > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ieduasst/stgv1r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.iea.commserv_v1/commserv/1.12z/perf/PerformanceOther/player.html > > < > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ieduasst/stgv1r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.iea.commserv_v1/commserv/1.12z/perf/PerformanceOther/player.html > > > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ieduasst/stgv1r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.iea.commserv_v1/commserv/1.11z/security/security/player.html > > < > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ieduasst/stgv1r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.iea.commserv_v1/commserv/1.11z/security/security/player.html > > > Cheers, > Rob > > > Rob, we are at z/OS 1.11. Are you saying the performance was worse prior to that. Heaven forbid :-( Jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
