If you take frequent checkpoints, you could cancel, back out to the last check point, then restart on another system.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:47 AM, McKown, John <john.mck...@healthmarkets.com> wrote: > I guess zero downtime would require that all "server" type functionality be > duplexed on multiple images and that said servers have a way to either hand > off their current work, or refuse futher work so that the duplexed server can > take over all new connection requests. I guess that is possible. No wonder it > is so expensive. And I shudder to think about some processing that I remember > from the past - batch jobs that ran for __days__! > > -- > John McKown -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
