Peter,

I am curious about your last statement.  While I can understand not allowing
telnet/rlogin, what would be the reasoning for denying SSH access?

Rob Schramm

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) <
peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com> wrote:

> >The OMVS TSO command is still a convenience for people primarily using
> >foreground TSO. A separate telnet session is not always convenient,
> >and in some cases[1] not even possible.
>
> You're right. But, using a unix shell through a 3270 data stream
> interface the way TSO provides it, is a PITA, IMHO.
>
> "People primarily using TSO foreground" will not gain much from their
> 3270 experience, because UNIX shell command line is so much different
> from TSO/ISPF that you better start to learn it and then feel
> comfortable working in that other environment. This is the background
> for my statement "I consider it TSO/OMVS obsolete".
>
> It doesn't help, as you mentioned, when SSH/telnet/rlogin is not
> available or not allowed.
>
> --
> Peter Hunkeler
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>



-- 
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Engineer

w: 513.305.6224

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to