Peter, I am curious about your last statement. While I can understand not allowing telnet/rlogin, what would be the reasoning for denying SSH access?
Rob Schramm On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) < peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com> wrote: > >The OMVS TSO command is still a convenience for people primarily using > >foreground TSO. A separate telnet session is not always convenient, > >and in some cases[1] not even possible. > > You're right. But, using a unix shell through a 3270 data stream > interface the way TSO provides it, is a PITA, IMHO. > > "People primarily using TSO foreground" will not gain much from their > 3270 experience, because UNIX shell command line is so much different > from TSO/ISPF that you better start to learn it and then feel > comfortable working in that other environment. This is the background > for my statement "I consider it TSO/OMVS obsolete". > > It doesn't help, as you mentioned, when SSH/telnet/rlogin is not > available or not allowed. > > -- > Peter Hunkeler > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Rob Schramm Senior Systems Engineer w: 513.305.6224 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
