In
<dc74548a025aff4a85f46926802a9b23063d2...@chsa1035.share.beluni.net>,
on 05/05/2011
at 09:06 AM, "Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)"
<peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com> said:
>You're right. But, using a unix shell through a 3270 data stream
>interface the way TSO provides it, is a PITA, IMHO.
I'm not denying that the OMVS command is klunky, nor that it imposes
restrictions not dictated either by the 3270 or by TSO I/O services.
But sometimes it is more convenient than maintaining separate
sessions.
>because UNIX shell command line is so much different
>from TSO/ISPF that you better start to learn it and then feel
>comfortable working in that other environment.
I never claimed that the OMVS command was a substitute to learning
Unix syntax; in fact, I don't see how it has any relevance to the
issue of familiarity. Were you thinking of ISHELL?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
