Ed, > I consider that cheaper and a lot less cumbersome than VLF. > I was at one place and they had a good size turnover of Sysprogs and none of > them even thought about VLF after applying fixes. > There was a decent number of head scratching as to why fixes didn't fix. [Ron Hawkins] VLF caching of load modules is managed dynamically through an interface with Program Fetch. If the load library is not frozen in LLA, or you issue an LLA refresh, any replaced modules will be picked up automatically. There's nothing your Sysprogs have to think about with VLF.
Ron ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
