On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:50:35 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote: >On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: ><deleted> >> But wouldn't a FIN APAR obviate much of the cloak-and-dagger? >> The only thing inappropriate to a FIN APAR is preannouncing the >> particular future release. Apparently Jim is authorized to >> make such an announcement here. (This in no way obligates >> IBM, blah, blah, blah.) >> >An APAR can be closed as Fixed in a future release. Doesn't specify >anything about which release or any other fixes or changes. > That's what I was trying to say. This issue could be described in a FIN APAR, omitting identification of the future release, but otherwise dispelling most of the mystery.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
