>Maybe it's getting better. It now uses HTTP instead of insisting on HTTPS. Really? After authentification (which *I* would insist on being https) it stays https for me. Which makes a lot of sense, as we don't want our company's software problems to become common knowledge.
>o I had the site bookmarked with my user ID in the query_string so it > was preset on the login page; all I needed to type was my password. Isn't that a preference set somewhere in the operating system? I never let the OS 'help' me by remembering my userids. But you're probably not using windoofs, either :-) >o I'd like the composition window to use a monospaced font for times > when I supply a code example, as earlier today. Perhaps I can profile > this, but I don't know how. Why should the SR people listen to us? According to them, we're a minority that only complains! >o It's bandwidth-profligate: 100KB for a 10-line message payload? Sheesh! Almost all of IBMs webpages are. Try accessing it on a 45kB line. You might as well hit your head on a wall immediately! Takes in excess of 5 minutes (and so it is doubly useless when you have to needlessly click yourself through several pages before you reach the one you need), and believe me, a 100kB webpage does NOT take 5 minutes to load. (When it is written by someone who knows what they're doing.) I always have the impression that IBM is trying to spy on me and hitting blank walls since I safeguard even my company PC. As far as I am concerned, they have fixed one or two blatant errors, but they close their collective ears and eyes to anything regarding usability ('intuitive usage'). Much better to 'educate' customers (as in - tell them they're just too stupid to understand the grand scheme of their ideas - and do it in such a way that the customer feels stupid and relents and uses it.) With the exception of one or two points, *everything* I said back in March still holds true. And if the rest of you don't start telling the SR people that my points are valid, then we all will be stuck with an inferior product that makes our life infinitely harder when we have a problem. At this point, they consider me the lone dissenter. Oh well, IBM most probably doesn't *want* customers to open problems. After all, they don't have problems in their code, right? (All the usual, long-time IBM suspects from this list excluded, of course!) Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html