>It might be a good idea to add a NOARM parameter because FORCE,ARM is
>less dangerous than FORCE and then have FORCE,NORARM mean what the
>current FORCE means.  Then if just FORCE is issued, have a prompt for
>ARM or NOARM. 

This is unnecessary. In general, you cannot issue FORCE without having 
first done CANCEL or FORCE,ARM.

That is actually a reason why "ARM" might be a verb, it is preparing 
(arming) the system (if the FORCE,ARM is not effective) for using "full 
FORCE".

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to