In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
12/22/2005
at 09:43 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Ditto. Phil, with all your problems dealing
>with IBM, why do you rise to their defence?
I find it ironic. If IBM believes that he has divulged proprietary
data, then of course they won't tell him of any customers running z/OS
on Hercules under an NDA. So his lack of proof is not only not proof
of absence, it isn't even suggestive of absence.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
