> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 10:35 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Why _TZ put times 7 minutes off?
> 
> On 3/2/2012 8:25 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
> > Particularly now that STP is just a matter of code rather than
> > hardware, it makes less and less sense (from the customer's viewpoint
> > of course) for this to be a chargeable feature, which was still the
> > case when I last checked.  As long as it is a chargeable feature it
> is
> > hard to cost-justify unless you are running a multi-system sysplex
> > environment that requires it or you have some unusual requirement
> that
> > really demands your TOD clock be that accurate.  That it is the "best
> > practice" and the only sure way for keeping the TOD clock accurate
> > makes it nice to have for a number of reasons; but if management asks
> > if it is a "must have" additional expense or a feature you can live
> without, in many cases the latter response must be given.
> 
> IMHO, STP should be included in the price of the machine.
> 

Agreed. The fact that syncing time cost money is one of the more egregious 
difficulties in explaining why mainframes are a good idea.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to