In <0963859761364257.wa.tom.rusnakqbe....@bama.ua.edu>, on 03/13/2012
at 01:29 AM, Tom Rusnak <tom.rus...@qbe.com> said:
>All evidence I can find says that the "NOT SIGN" is x'AC' in unicode
>and on unix environments.
Unix supports multiple code pages, not all of them ISO 8859-x.
>However, if I use the z/os 1.11 TCP/IP FTP the x'5F' translates to a
>x'5E'
That's probably a ®, but it depends on the code page you're using.
>Is there any translation table in z/os 1.11 that translates the "NOT
>SIGN" x'5F' to an ascii x'AC',
These is no ASCII 'AC'X; you really need to know what code pages
you're using to get a correct translation.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
