Ok, thank you, you gave me something to think about.
Maybe I should try to call the mains in a different way.
Now my co-worker is off for holidays for three weeks,
I will try to run some tests myself. I'll keep you informed.
The mains are in fact compiled with RENT and DLL options and linked as
DLLs;
that is kind of site standard, regardless of program type (sub or main).
But indeed, the opsys calls the mains using ATTACH or LINK, AFAIK,
and maybe I should try to do the same. CEEFETCH is not needed,
because the mains are started at CEESTART and the LE initialization
for the second enclave is performed, anyway.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 29.03.2012 16:45, schrieb Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.):
In<201203281648.40289.bernd.oppol...@t-online.de>, on 03/28/2012
at 04:48 PM, Bernd Oppolzer<bernd.oppol...@t-online.de> said:
The Mains (and the PL/1 sub program test objects) are - or can be -
DLLs, compiled with the RENT compile option, so they have to be
called using CEEFETCH, because the proper WSA initialization etc
has to be done.
Are you sure that using CEEFETCH for MAIN, or putting a MAIN in a DLL,
are supported?
because the proper WSA initialization etc has to be done.
Isn't that what MAIN is for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
