On 30 March 2012 16:45, Steve Comstock <st...@trainersfriend.com> wrote: > On 3/30/2012 2:37 PM, Tony Harminc wrote: [...] >> Sure - but that's a quite different situation. We are talking about LE >> assembler calling LE assembler when it may be desirable that the >> called program not perceive that the caller is LE enabled. > > > I guess I just don't see the scenario where you want to do this.
Well it's not *my* scenario - I think it's what the OP was talking about. Or at least a possible solution to the problem he's having with two LE enclaves. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
