No, because if you arbitrarily use the key as determined by IVSK, why not
simply do it in Key 0?

On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:29:55 -0400 Micheal Butz <michealb...@optonline.net>
wrote:

:>Hi,
:>
:> 
:>
:> 
:>
:> I am getting S0C4 04 within a wait which leads me to believe that the
:>storage key of the ECB storage key is not the same as the PSW STORAGE KEY
:>8- 11
:>
:> 
:>
:> 
:>
:>Does the following code make sense to resolve this address
:>
:> 
:>
:> 
:>
:>    TESTAUTH FCTN=1          TEST APF AUTORIZATION         
:>
:>    LTR   R15,R5             CHECK R15                     
:>
:>    BNZ   NAPF&SYSNDX        NOT APF                       
:>
:>    MODESET MODE=SUP,KEY=NZERO  TURN ON BIT 15 IN PSW  
:>
:>    LA    R0,REPLY_ECB      GET ECB ADDRESS                
:>
:>    IVSK  R1,R0             GET STORAGE KEY        
:>
:>    MODESET KEYREG=R1,SAVEKEY=OLDKEY SET STORAGE KEY IN PSW 
:>
:>    
:>
:>  WAIT=REPLY_ECB
:>
:> 
:>
:>   MODESET MODE=PROB,KEY=NZERO       back to current TCB key       

--
Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to