We had a FCTC issue at the start of the year that even IBM couldn't answer, 
they kept insisting a hardware engineer check our working FICON cables and 
Brocade switch.

Turned out the leading digit in the IODF CUADD field needs to match the Channel 
Subsystem (CSS) number. This fixed our FCTC's.

Thanks to the peer Australian customer who managed to get this working and 
kindly helped us out with this advice.

Cheers,
MARK DOUGLAS

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Vince Getgood
Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2012 2:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Implementing CA-MIM using FCTC

Hi all,
The site I'm on is replacing GRS with CA-MIM.
  
This is mainly 'cos they don't have a 'PLEX, but do have two closely coupled 
LPARS on different CECS.  
Both of those CECS will be moving to different remote sites, and connectivity 
will be over FCTC's. 
>From what I know, GRS will only "talk" over a FCTC using XRC, and they can't 
>use that. 'cos they don't have a 'PLEX.

We've defined all new FCTC's (Exxx and Fxxx unit / CU addresses), and have  
defined all LPARS to talk to each other both on the existing CECs and the new 
CECs.

CA-MIM provides a procedure for testing the CTC "paths" before going live, 
PROCCTC  (We have called ours MIICTC)

To run this, you are supposed to start the proc, and pass it the CTC unit 
address, i.e. S PROCCTC,/E700 (or in our case S MIICTC,/E700 - you need the / 
for a 4 digit unit address)

However, when we start our proc, it fails: -

S MIICTC,/E700                                                       
/£HASP100 MIICTC   ON STCINRDR                                        
 IEF695I START MIICTC   WITH JOBNAME MIICTC   IS ASSIGNED TO USER STC 
    , GROUP PROD                                                      
/£HASP373 MIICTC   STARTED                                            
/ACF9CCCD USERID STC      IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB - MIICTC            
/IEF403I MIICTC - STARTED - TIME=08.34.14                             
 -                                                --TIMINGS (MINS.)-- 
           ----PAGING COUNTS---                                       
 -JOBNAME  STEPNAME PROCSTEP    RC   EXCP   CONN    TCB    SRB  CLOCK 
  SERV  PG  PAGE  SWAP   VIO SWAPS                                    
 -MIICTC            IEFPROC  FLUSH      0      0 ******    .00     .0 
     0   0     0     0     0     0                                    
/IEF453I MIICTC - JOB FAILED - JCL ERROR - TIME=08.34.14              
 -MIICTC   ENDED.  NAME-                     TOTAL TCB CPU TIME=   .00
  TOTAL ELAPSED TIME=    .0                                           
/£HASP395 MIICTC   ENDED                                              
IEE132I START COMMAND DEVICE ALLOCATION ERROR

The JCL is good, and the unit address correct.

We know that SMS was getting in the mix previously, 'cos they EXCLUDE a bunch 
of devices / unit addresses in their "valid dasd", but they changed the ACS 
routines to exclude E* and F* devices: -

FILTLIST &VALID_DASD EXCLUDE('3590-1',                    
                            64%,92%,B4%,1F%,06%,4A%,E*,F*,

And have put them live.  (Don't ask why they do this, I don't know!)

I ran a SMS test case against the ACTIVE SMS CDS on all three LPARs, specifying 
an Exxx and a Fxxx unit address, and now they do NOT have a storage class 
assigned, whereas they were getting one assigned previously.

However, the proc still fails.

CA-MIM is critical to the CEC move project (of course).  I have CA looking at 
it, but can anyone else shed some light on what might be happening here?

TIA. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


***************************** Disclaimer *****************************

The contents of this electronic message and any attachments are intended only 
for the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. They 
may only be used for the purposes for which they were supplied. If you are not 
the addressee, you are notified that any transmission, distribution, 
downloading, printing or photocopying of the contents of this message or 
attachments is strictly prohibited. The privilege of confidentiality attached 
to this message and attachments is not waived, lost or destroyed by reason of 
mistaken delivery to you. If you receive this message in error please notify 
the sender by return e-mail or telephone.

Please note: the Department of Public Works carries out automatic software 
scanning, filtering and blocking of E-mails and attachments (including emails 
of a personal nature) for detection of viruses, malicious code, SPAM, 
executable programs or content it deems unacceptable. All reasonable 
precautions will be taken to respect the privacy of individuals in accordance 
with the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld). Personal information will only be 
used for official purposes, e.g. monitoring Departmental Personnel's compliance 
with Departmental Policies. Personal information will not be divulged or 
disclosed to others, unless authorised or required by Departmental Policy 
and/or law.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to