> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward E. Jaffe > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:19 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Billing for SRB Time > >
<snip> > There's no real architectural difference between a GCP and a zAAP (or > even an IFL for that matter). It's really just a question of > what work > gets dispatched there... > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > | Edward E. Jaffe | | Depends on what you mean by a "real" difference. z/OS uses at least one instruction which is not implemented on an IFL as it is on a GP processor. That's why you will get a "check stop" condition if you IPL z/OS in an LPAR which is defined as using an IFL. I agree that a problem program should see no differences. I was always curious if I could figure out a way to "cheat" to run COBOL on a zAAP somehow. But I don't have a zAAP to mess around with. And I don't run z/OS 1.7 either (isn't that were zAAPs are first supported?) But I will admit that I don't know exactly how different a zAAP is from a GCP. I just remember that some things will NOT work on a zAAP. I thought it was supervisory instructions and some types of interrupts. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
