Well good for you, but we are talking about "IN SYSTEM REPLICATION" and how it may change the need for faster tape speeds.
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ed Gould > Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2006 4:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Disk vs Tape scenario > > On Feb 21, 2006, at 5:29 AM, Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote: > > > Ed, > > > > Help me out here mate. Are you talking about in-system replication > > or remote > > copy? > > > > Here's a hint - in-system replication (Dual Copy) doesn't care if two > > controllers are connected by 16x4Gb Fibre Channels or two cans and > > a piece > > of string - because ***IN*** system replication makes the new copy > > available > > without actually copying a single track of data. > > > > Ron > ------------------SNIP------------------------------- > > Remote copy is what I am talking about. > > AFAIK in house dual copy (depending on manufacturer) is pretty much > the same. > > Ed > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
