Sorry, that wasn't me who said it was a PL/1 compiler.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> 03/27/2006 10:29 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Re: Wonder why IBM code quality is suffering? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No, PL/C was Cornell University's student PL/1 compiler. > (I remember it, too; Waterloo had it as one of their batch compilers, as > did ISU and many other colleges and universities around the world.) > > The PL/X genealogy included PL/S and PL/AS, but not PL/C. posting in pl/s, et al thread in this n.g. from a couple years ago http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004g.html#46 PL/? History wikipedia entry for pl/c http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL/C another pl/i subset was pl.8 developed as part of 801/risc project. cp.r was written in pl.8. misc. posts mentioning 801, pl.8, cp.r, romp, rios, power, power/pc, etc http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#801 and for some drift, a recent post mentioning wikipedia and power/pc http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006f.html#6 64-bit architectures & 32-bit instructions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
