We run both CA-Datacom and DB2; my perception (not yet backed up by figures) is that Datacom is considerably less resource-intensive than DB2. One thing I hope to do this year is to figure out a way to compare their performance. First I need to make sure they are reasonably well-tuned, though, and then I need to try to determine what sort of differences there are in resource chargeback.
Jon <snip> The conversion was from CA-IDEAL to Micro Focus Cobol and the migration of CA-DATACOM to Oracle. http://www.move2open.com/m2o-bupa-success-story.html Given that CA-DATACOM is a '4gl' database, I would suspect that it might not scale well and may have been slurping a lot of horsepower. And, given CA's historic pricing postures..... </snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
