When I was in support many years ago, many times customers would call asking us about an S40D or S0DC abends - "it just went away!" (For the peanut gallery, the problem is that there is no more left in below-the-line private to acquire LSQA for the RTM control blocks.)
I've lost track of the times I've told people why 0M is a bad idea for a server-type program, and in general is a bad idea. A couple of weeks ago, I had to explain this to one of our developers, who has gray hair/beard (but I don't know about the hairy chest). Later, Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hoelscher > Sent: Wednesday April 12 2006 05:47 > > our sysprogs discourage (prevent?) 0M on the belief (fact?) > that if such a job were to run-away and consume all available > memoryon its way to ebending, there would be no room to set > up abend-related control blocks in memory when it did abend - > thus we are constrained to use 2047M ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
