So, really what is being said here is: z9 = no ESCON = no GRS via CTC = Only CF plexes! And no monoplexes in GRS ring!
Or, am I confused. Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Programmer (509) 335-7359 Information Technology Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-1222 > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Shane > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:45 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: GRS and Ficon CTC > > Radoslaw wrote: > > > Do you mean GRS over CTC, but *not* over XCF ? > > Yep ... :( > > > IMHO you can't do it. GRS requires pretty ancient device type (BCTC), > > while this type is not supported on FICON chpid. > > Yes, I was expecting the same way, hoping for different. > > > Probably it is IBM "recommendation" to use XCF (and then sysplex). > > This is my likely direction, but the water needed testing. > > Bruce then wrote: > > > It doesn't say "no FICON" but the list is explicit. > > Not to me it ain't - change "can mean" to "means", and the question > would never have occurred. > > Thanks folks. > > Shane ... > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
