For a few years, we were presumably in "no new COBOL -- just maintain what you 
have" mode.  Oddly enough, our code base seemed to keep growing.  Apparently, 
some things just write themselves.

For that matter, the whole concept that maintenance is something that could be 
performed by mindless drones is only rarely true.  When I look at what is 
considered "maintenance" in the software business, I frequently see complex 
entities -- added functionality, entire new subsystems, new interfaces.  If I 
maintained my house like that, I would have maintained myself into a 35-room 
mansion with a sauna and a drawbridge by now.  But "it's maintenance 
programming -- it shouldn't take so long."

Jon




<snip>
 Personally, I don't hear of a LOT of new development being done in COBOL,
but certainly do hear of a lot of applications continuing to run (and being
maintained) in COBOL. 
</snip>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to