Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Despite the "dozens" of errors, do you need to do anything more than delete the single definition in your macro? It appears that the definitions are equivalent.
The two definitions are indeed identical in every respect. The only required change is to delete my symbol definition, which occurs in every program that uses IEFZB4D0. By guessing the name correctly, I saved myself the trouble of having to convert those same programs to use the "official" symbol -- which I would have done even in the event I had chosen a non-conflicting name like S99RBXSZ instead. Some might consider that mild OCD. But, that's what I would have done.
-- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
