>If I were doing it, I'd allocate a "reasonable" size table with room for >expansion (ie: Empty Slots past the currently assigned slot number). A 4K >table, has room for 1024 Slots/ISVs. Even a 1K table has room for 256 >slots. Either 1K or 2K should be more than enough for the foreseeable >future needs based on the 1 Slot per ISV method without the need to expand >it via maintenance.
Why do you think IBM did anything other than that? Bob Shannon Rocket Software ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
