On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:23:07 +0000, Ted MacNEIL wrote: >Why does the compiler have to be APF'd? >That's the way I have seen it at every shop I have worked at. I don't recall having seen that at any account. It would raise my eyebrows for sure. The ROT is to avoid APF unless there is a proven reason why your site actually needs it. Even then I spend time looking for alternatives before adding a library to the APFLIST (PROGxx member). The compiler itself isn't marked AC=1 at your shop, is it?? Is the compiler library a part of an APF-required concatenation in some other PROC? (Do you allow compiles via CICS or something?) -- Tom Schmidt Madison, WI
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
