If a prog modify some part of the hardware I-cache it will run slower because the hardware cache becomes invalid. Reentrant coding avoid this.
Well also the getmain/freemain for reentrant code require some cylce. I don't know what is better in terms of CPU for a quick and dirty pgm. Roland -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 5:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Is the teaching of non-reentrant HLASM coding practices ever defensible? > reentrant code tends to run faster than non-reentrant code Could you elaborate on that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
