On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:23:26 -0600 "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>IMO, for *anybody* (let alone an auditor) to have deliberately :>"demonstrated" a newly-discovered "hole" in that manner on a system such :>as yours should have resulted in a criminal indictment of that person. Subject to the definition of "run pampant". I presume it wasn't destructive. It makes the point to senior management. I have done the same. :>People daily go to jail for far less. I doubt it. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
