Heh! Thanks guys. I guess I was thinking that if *any* LOADxx was found in SYSx.IPLPARM, that's what would be used! That wouldn't be any good. Well that makes things a whole lot easier! Sorry to display my lapse in reasoning there - lol
Steve Horein -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 6:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Moving LOADxx You are making the issue more complicated than it should be. <g> Go ahead an move the LOADxx parm member into SYSx.IPLPARM... <snip excessive amounts of quoted text> -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 6:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Moving LOADxx Why not just use something like LOADPx for the production LOADxx and LOADSx for the sandbox ? Then you can... <snip excessive amounts of quoted text> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
