On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 22:47 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote: > > That leaves 2 engines for the other 5 LPARs - with at least one having > > two logical engines defined. Makes for a bad logical~physical ratio. > > What is the highest recommended ratio on modern machines?
Pick a (low) number. For me 2.5:1 would be where things start to get rubbery. Don't know what the "highest recommended ratio" would be - especially on "modern machines". Keeping a eye on capture ratio is always worthwhile. There are other issues of course - GRS ring at high ratios is death. Ditto for sysplex with CF LPARs rather than true (dedicated) CF engines. And yes, people still consider it an option. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
