I'm one of those sys prog and I really dislike CA and have worked with and installed both and RMM is awful. TMS is the standard that RMM tries to imitate. Unless price is the issue, TMS wins. My $0.02
Jack Kelly LA Systems @ US Courts x 202-502-2390 John Benik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> 02/08/2007 04:18 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject RMM to CA-1 or CA-1 to RMM Well, it seems we have two directions we can go with our tape management system. We have some systems that run CA-1 and some that run RMM. At first we stated that we wanted to go to CA-1. This seems to be what the majority of people use. My personnel opinion I like CA-1 much better, I would like to get some opinions on what people think is the best way to go. I know, (because I've been there), most system programmers will choose RMM... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
